Improving Organizational Retention

It is possible to identify several models that can be applied to this case. For example, one can mention motivation-hygiene or two factor theory introduced by Frederick Herzberg. This scholar identifies two groups of factors that affect a person’s attitude toward his/her job.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Improving Organizational Retention specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More One should first focus on the so-called motivators such as recognition, opportunities for professional development, and opportunities for promotion (Sheldrake, 2003, p. 153). They are important for increasing a person’s satisfaction with his/her job and making him/her more motivated. In turn, there are hygiene factors such salary, work conditions, or schedule. They do not make an individual more committed to a particular organization (Sheldrake, 2003, p. 153). However, if the management disregards these issues, the workers of a b usiness can become dissatisfied with their job. This theory can be useful for explaining this case. It should be kept in mind that the management of JC’s Casino increased the wages of employees, but many of them chose to leave this organization. So, this example confirms Herzberg’s assumption, according to which compensation does not increase an individual’s satisfaction with his/her work. The supporters of this approach may say that the management should focus on the factors that are called satisfiers; for example, one can speak about opportunities for promotion. Furthermore, it is possible to speak about equity theory introduced by Stacey Adam. This model implies that employees are more likely to be satisfied with their work if they believe that their compensation reflects their individual effort (Anderson, 2001, p. 55). In turn, workers are more likely to feel discontent, if they believe that other people receive a preferential treatment (Anderson, 2001, p. 5 5). This theory can also be helpful for explaining this case, since some employees in JC’s Casino occupy a privileged position even though they do not display good results. In particular, it is possible to speak about the pit boss Joe who is the step-son of the owner. There are several stressors that should not be overlooked by the management. For example, one should speak about the behavior of Joe. He is described as an incompetent and overbearing person. This individual might have forced many dealers to leave the casinos. It is possible that these people do want to accept him as a manager.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Therefore, the HR managers should first determine if these accusations are true. One should not forget that many people, who choose to quit any company, can accuse the managers of various misdeeds. So, one should take such accusations for granted. H owever, if these claims are confirmed, HR managers should not disregard this issue. In particular, they should inform the owner about Joe’s behavior. It may be necessary to find a new employee who will act as a pit boss. The problem is that people may lose their commitment to an organization, if they have to deal with a manager who bullies or humiliates them. It is possible that a new pit boss will be able to motivate employees and make them more committed to the goals set by this organization. This is one of the recommendations that can be made. Another stressor that should be considered is role ambiguity. In other words, employees do not always know what kind of responsibilities they will be asked to assume. For instance, some full-time employees, who work in accounting departments, have to clean-up the rooms. Yet, at the same, they have to be diverted from their direct duties. Under such circumstances, people can believe that they cannot cope with each of the tasks that ar e assigned to them. As a result, they may experience stress. In order to overcome this challenge, the managers should develop a new schedule and hire new employees to ensure that the casino is sufficiently staffed. Apart from that, they need to develop an orientation program which is supposed to meet the needs of new hires. They should understand the performance standards that are set for them. Moreover, these people should be warned about the main pitfalls that they should avoid in the future. These are the main suggestions that can be put forward. Overall, in this case, Frederick Herzberg might have been helpful because the difficulties faced by JC’s Casinos can be explained by hygiene factors and absence of motivators. Overall, job satisfaction is critical for service organizations like casinos. Such companies are very concerned with the growing turnover of employees (Biolsi 2008, p. 123). As a rule, this turnover increases their operational expenses because they need to s pend more money on training and recruitment (Biolsi 2008, p. 123). Moreover, employees’ attitudes toward their work can affect customer relations management. For instance, clients can be dissatisfied with the services of a casino, if they have to interact with employees who have lost their motivation. This is why the role of job satisfaction should not be dismissed. Overall, this casino can improve retention in several ways.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Improving Organizational Retention specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More First of all, they can implement a performance appraisal system that can take into account the individual contribution of every worker. These people should see that the compensation accurately reflects their performance. Furthermore, the management should promote employees if they consistently show good results. This strategy may enable the management to address its HR problems. It shou ld be mentioned that motivated and satisfied workers can improve retention in a casinos. For example, experienced employees can act as mentors and they help new hires adjust to the requirements of employers (Biolsi 2008, p. 123). These people attract the attention of new employees to the major difficulties that they will need to overcome. Provided that a company lacks such professionals, it will not be able to retain new workers. In the long-term, this casino may not remain competitive. This is why the role of job satisfaction should not be overlooked by managers. Judging from this case study, the employees of this casino can be engaged in a counter-productive behavior. For example, they may do the work which is not directly related to their job. As it has been said before, some employees, who work in payroll or accounting departments, can be asked to do room cleaning. Therefore, they cannot do the tasks that best fit the education and skills. There are several alternatives that are available to the management. For example, they can hire new employees to make sure that the casino is adequately staffed. Furthermore, it is possible to say that the demand for the services of JCs casino has seasonal variations. Therefore, the management should focus on the development of a schedule that can reflect these seasonal variations. Overall, these examples suggest that employee retention is critical for effective performance of casinos. In order to recruit and retain employee, one should focus on aspects as performance evaluation methods, role clarity, work conditions, and promotion opportunities. This case is useful because it exemplifies some of the common HR problems faced by service organizations such as casinos. Reference List Anderson, N. (2001). Handbook of Industrial, Work Organizational Psychology:Â  Volume 2: Organizational Psychology. New York, NY: Sage. Biolsi, T. (2008). A Companion to the Anthropology of American Indians. New York, NY: John Wiley Sons,Adv ertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Sheldrake, J. (2003). Management Theory. New York, NY: Cengage Learning EMEA. This essay on Improving Organizational Retention was written and submitted by user The198 to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Kahn and Verifiability

Kahn and Verifiability Introduction Thomas Samuel Khun’s contribution to philosophy remains a significant milestone in nursing (and by extension, the field of science). Khun introduced the concept of â€Å"paradigm shift† in mainstream science by suggesting that scientific models undergo paradigm shifts (periodically) and therefore, the notion that scientific models develop in a linear manner is untrue.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kahn and Verifiability specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In this regard, Khun suggests that science cannot solely rely on objectivity but rather, by considering subjective aspects of the discipline as well (Klemke, Hollinger, Rudge, 1998). This paper analyzes Khun’s philosophy by evaluating how it revolutionized the philosophy of science. This paper also highlights how Khun’s philosophies helped the nursing practice, as opposed to hindering it. Finally, this paper evaluates if fals ification or verifiability provides a stable criterion for science, and if it is possible to have a significant statement without either of the two processes. How Khun Revolutionized the Philosophy of Science Khun’s contribution to science stretches through his achievements in the field. As explained above, one such achievement was his introduction of the concept of â€Å"paradigm shift,† not as an absolute operative principle of science but rather, as an important principle of science (Klemke, et al., 1998). Khun developed his principles by conducting a critical analysis of different individuals at MIT and Harvard. From these analyses, he opposed perverted science as â€Å"absolute as Baconian as over humanities idea† (Klemke, et al., 1998, p. 15). This was a good contribution of science. From these contributions, Khun remains a key figure of the dialectic in epistemology. How Khun’s Contribution helped Nursing Khun’s contribution to nursing stems from the revolutionary theory and its contribution to nursing. For many years, researchers held the opinion that nursing resembles revolutionary development models in other sciences (Dahnke Dreher, 2011). However, Khun changed this philosophy by evaluating different perceptions of health events in nursing and proposing that the existence of a single paradigm is unacceptable in the field. Many scholars accepted his view because nursing works by helping and caring for people who present different dynamics in care delivery. Therefore, Khun’s contribution has helped the nursing practice (as oppose to hindering it) because his views accommodated varying patient dynamics in nursing models (especially concerning the changing attitudes and different cultural dynamics influencing care delivery).Advertising Looking for essay on philosophy? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Falsification or Verification Khun’s arg ument of the functions of a scientific test mainly compares with Popper’s view on the same. Karl Popper was a respected philosopher but he greatly differed with Khun because he proposed that only falsification ensures the validity and reliability of scientific tests. Khun however maintained that scientific tests are supposed to affirm verification (as opposed to falsification) (Klemke, et al., 1998). Khun proposed that verification resembled â€Å"natural selection† in modern science because it established how the fitness of a theory is determined. Therefore, in a historical context, the process of verification identifies the most viable theory (among a pool of other similar theories). Khun meant that by verifying a theory, a scientist would easily establish the accuracy of a theory in defining reality. Therefore, contrary to proponents of falsification, Khun advocated for verifiability as the main criterion for evaluating theories. However, his assertions bore signifi cant flaws. Indeed, it is crucial to highlight why it is vital to eliminate the concept of verifiability because not all scientific evolutions gravitate towards an understandable goal of corresponding to reality. In fact, Khun agreed with scientists who considered this view to be unwarranted (Klemke, et al., 1998). Therefore, for any scientist to comprehend the dependability of a theory, they have to evaluate how it compares with falsification. Scientists deliberately use falsification for evaluating scientific paradigms because it is the only logical possible test for scientific selection (Klemke, et al., 1998). The criterion of falsification is therefore the missing link to Khun’s argument because a scientific theory differs from an ideological model because its hypotheses are amenable to falsification.  From the intrigues surrounding the debate of falsification and verification, it is safe to acknowledge the possibility of having a significant statement without verifying it. Measuring the falsification of a theory is therefore the main measure of understanding scientific paradigms. Therefore, based on the understanding of Khan’s flaw, falsification is a more suitable criterion of science. Consequently, scientists may make a significant scientific statement without verifying it. Conclusion After weighing the findings of this paper, it is crucial to acknowledge the contributions of Khun in science. His contribution to science also mirrors his contribution to nursing because his introduction of the concept of â€Å"paradigm shift† accommodates varying patient dynamics that occur in nursing. Patient dynamics manifest as a crucial factor in this analysis because nursing mainly focuses on caring for patients.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kahn and Verifiability specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In this regard, Khun’s contribution to nursing has helped the discipline , as opposed to hindering it. However, because not all scientific theories gravitate towards an understandable goal of corresponding with reality, falsification stands out as the more stable criterion for science. Therefore, it is possible to have a significant scientific paradigm without verifying it. References Dahnke, M. D Dreher, H. M. (2011). Philosophy of science for nursing practice:  concepts and application. New York: Springer. Klemke, E.D., Hollinger, R. Rudge. (1998). Introductory reading in the philosophy  of science (3rd ed). New York: Prometheus Books.